[tor-relays] Tor Relay Deployment Dilemma: Colocation vs Dedicated Servers for 10 Gbps

Part 2 - Looking for feedback on our Tor relay configuration decision:

Assuming both options cost the same and provide the same aggregate bandwidth—and by “better,” I mean improved advertised bandwidth, reliability, and diversity—is it preferable to deploy:

Option 2A: Colocation, where we own the hardware, for 2 x 10 Gbps, or

Option 2B: Dedicated servers, where we rent the hardware, for 4 x 10 Gbps?

We lean toward Option 2B because it offers higher total bandwidth and may provide enhanced hardware redundancy and scalability. Additionally, does the ideal choice depend on the relay’s role (e.g., exit vs. guard/middle nodes)?

Also, is there a more comprehensive way to define “better” for this context?

We appreciate any suggestions or refinements

I would define "better" in an UPS-assisted server, installed by yourself, encrypted via hardware key (USB stick) only used at boot, and removed later after machine is powered up.

···

On 4/2/25 08:00, Tor at 1AEO via tor-relays wrote:

Option 2B: Dedicated servers, where we rent the hardware, for 4 x 10 Gbps?

--
Att.

(+5521) 97914-8106 (Signal)
PHOSPHORUS NETWORKS | HNO3 SYSTEMS
https://www.linkedin.com/in/fabio1337br/

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list -- tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tor-relays-leave@lists.torproject.org