Tor relay or WebTunnel?

I apologize if this subject has been discussed. I tried looking around the forum but could not find anything. I might just be bad at looking\searching though.

Anyway;

I have a 1gbit up/down connection and hardware good enough to use it fully (in regards to the number of possible connections), and since I hardly use maybe only 5-10% of it I want to donate these resources to the Tor project.

I would like to focus my efforts in providing access to those who are most affected by censorship which is why I am leaning towards hosting a WebTunnel bridge at the moment.

However I also appreciate that the bridge is of less use if the health of the tor network itself is not great (and by “health” I mean specifically the number of “good” relays vs. relays controlled by bad actors)

As far as I understand the priority is:

  • exit relay (if you can, which I can’t)
  • guard\middle relay
  • bridge

Does this priority list account for the new WebTunnel bridge as well, or could adding a WebTunnel be considered more “valuable” than adding another relay (currently of course, I’m not trying to predict the future health of the tor network)

I’d say it is more valuable to run a WebTunnel at the moment, there are plenty of relays and since you can’t help with an exit relay, I believe setting up a bridge is the best option.

Have a look at available relays and bridges, if you look closely, there’s been a sudden drop of bridges, which is even more visible if you check bridges by IP version.

If you can, configure your bridge to use IPv6 as well.