My question is quite simple but the answer is a little difficult in my opinion:
Consider a contract for a server which has still 6 month till the end and the initial setup of a bridge is burned in one country lets call it “RI”. It is still working in a country lets call it “UR” but the usage is constantly declining. A test run of a standalone snowflake on this IP shows its still available in both countries. To make use of this server, I’d like to “recycle” it. I know a change of IP or an additional IP would be the best solution, but this is not available in all cases.
Am I putting the users in risk because the IP is already known by the censors and additionally most likely at some point the country “RI” and “UR” might exchange their “selectors”?
It seams the censors are having different block lists for UDP and TCP at the moment…
So, is it the responsibility of the user or is it my responsibility to stop providing the service, when I know it has been detected by a censor?