Bittorrent transmission doesn’t use the QUIC protocol, making this transmission method extremely easy to detect (a client suddenly switches to using the QUIC protocol to communicate with previously connected nodes after initiating a DHT network connection). ZeroNet also does poorly in this regard (China hasn’t blocked 0Net only because there are few users, making it not worth the attention).
I think solving the problem of malicious nodes in the DHT network will be another challenge (ZeroNet once tried to implement a DHT network for 0Net, but ultimately failed to do so due to the inability to solve the problem of establishing trust between clients).
Tracker servers are not that reliable, and it’s easy for tracker servers to detect that it’s not a Bittorrent client. Maintaining trusted tracker servers would also make it easier for censors to block the entire network.
It’s not feasible as DHT can be easily blocked and it already had practical example of it happening in the past, blocking DHT also causes less colleteral damage than blocking WebRTC.
Besides in my very personal opinion DHT should be preserved as last ditch attempt in keeping communications and not be sullied with things trying to mimic it.
Let’s imagine there is another country’s internet blackout. DHT in theory allows for local peers to keep communication at least on intranet level, this gets content and files passed within that small region even if outside internet is blocked. Think like RetroShare which was working during blackouts.