# Webtunnel Bridge Image Outdated

**URL:** https://forum.torproject.org/t/webtunnel-bridge-image-outdated/21343
**Category:** Relay Operator
**Created:** [March 15, 2026, 2:46pm UTC](https://forum.torproject.org/t/webtunnel-bridge-image-outdated/21343 "2026-03-15T14:46:48Z")
**Posts on this page:** 5
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jabdoa2](https://forum.torproject.org/user_avatar/forum.torproject.org/jabdoa2/32/7993_2.png) [@jabdoa2](https://forum.torproject.org/u/jabdoa2)
#### Post date: [March 15, 2026, 2:46pm UTC](https://forum.torproject.org/t/webtunnel-bridge-image-outdated/21343/1 "2026-03-15T14:46:48Z")

</div>

It seems as the [thetorproject/webtunnel-bridge - Docker Image](https://hub.docker.com/r/thetorproject/webtunnel-bridge) referenced in the docs has not been updated for four month. It contains an old tor version + libraries and appears to be generally rather unmaintained. It is also missing tags (just “latest”) and seems to be only manually updated. Should this image still be used? Is there a better way? Should the docs be updated? Running unmaintained/outdated software on the internet worries me a bit. Opinions?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Lind](https://forum.torproject.org/user_avatar/forum.torproject.org/lind/32/7525_2.png) [@Lind](https://forum.torproject.org/u/Lind)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2026, 9:46am UTC](https://forum.torproject.org/t/webtunnel-bridge-image-outdated/21343/2 "2026-03-16T09:46:54Z")

</div>

The WebTunnel bridge hasn’t seen many updates, either. I think the docker image has the latest WebTunnel bridge software:  
[https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/webtunnel/-/commits/main](https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/webtunnel/-/commits/main)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jabdoa2](https://forum.torproject.org/user_avatar/forum.torproject.org/jabdoa2/32/7993_2.png) [@jabdoa2](https://forum.torproject.org/u/jabdoa2)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2026, 12:58pm UTC](https://forum.torproject.org/t/webtunnel-bridge-image-outdated/21343/3 "2026-03-16T12:58:52Z")

</div>

That is true but the image contains more than just the webtunnel transport. Maybe we should run a separate image just for the tor binary? Is that possible? Currently my bridges are shown as outdated due to the old tor version.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Lind](https://forum.torproject.org/user_avatar/forum.torproject.org/lind/32/7525_2.png) [@Lind](https://forum.torproject.org/u/Lind)
#### Post date: [March 18, 2026, 3:23am UTC](https://forum.torproject.org/t/webtunnel-bridge-image-outdated/21343/4 "2026-03-18T03:23:25Z")

</div>

I don’t know if it’s possible to only use the container for the bridge binary. I think the next best way is by building WebTunnel bridge from source code following this guide:

> **[Tor Project | Compile and run WebTunnel from the source](https://community.torproject.org/relay/setup/webtunnel/source/)**
>
> Defend yourself against tracking and surveillance. Circumvent censorship. | Compile and run WebTunnel from the source

Also remember to install Tor following this guide:

> **[Installation](https://support.torproject.org/little-t-tor/getting-started/installing/)**
>
> These instructions are meant for installing tor the network daemon i.e. little-t tor. For instructions to install Tor Browser, refer to the Tor Browser user manual.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![unic3rn](https://forum.torproject.org/user_avatar/forum.torproject.org/unic3rn/32/7511_2.png) [@unic3rn](https://forum.torproject.org/u/unic3rn)
#### Post date: [March 19, 2026, 2:54pm UTC](https://forum.torproject.org/t/webtunnel-bridge-image-outdated/21343/5 "2026-03-19T14:54:59Z")

</div>

> **[Latest Docker image is with an outdated Tor version (#59) · Issues · The Tor...](https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/webtunnel/-/issues/59#note_3374389)**
>
> Hello, looking at the issues in this repository, it looks like the docker images don't get updated frequently, which is sad, because they would include the most up-to-date...
