[tor-relays] webtunnel bridges for the telegram distributor

Hi, I assume you'd like a visualization showing how close we are to
reaching 30 webtunnel bridges, right?

You can extract this info by parsing Onionoo[1], for example:

transport distributor count
webtunnel email 1
webtunnel telegram 26
webtunnel none 23
webtunnel lox 1
webtunnel settings 180
webtunnel https 120

Thank you for running bridges, Jonah!
Gus

[1] Sources – Tor Metrics
[2] Bridges per distributor ($221) · Snippets · GitLab

···

On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 03:44:46PM -0500, Jonah Aragon via tor-relays wrote:

Is there a place to see how many bridges are currently assigned to each
distribution method?

Jonah

On 7/17/25 8:20 AM, meskio via tor-relays wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Russia is extending their Tor block[0]. Currently, they block Fully Encrypted
> Protocols like obfs4 on some mobile networks[1]. For a while, WebTunnel has been
> a good alternative, but since June, Roskomnadzor has enumerated some WebTunnel
> bridges and blocked them by domain name[2]. Bridge operators can bypass this
> block by creating a new subdomain or using a new domain for their WebTunnel
> bridge.
>
> We are working on multiple solutions for this problem. And one of them is to
> start distributing WebTunnel bridges over Telegram[3]. In the past, our Telegram
> distribution bot has proved to be fairly resistant to the attempts to enumerate
> bridges made by the Russian censor.
>
> But to be able to do that, we first need to have enough bridges assigned to that
> distributor. We are looking for a minimum of 30 bridges assigned to this
> distributor. If you are in the capacity to host a WebTunnel bridge, please do
> so!
>
> You can follow the documentation on the Community portal[4] and configure your
> WebTunnel bridge with this option in your torrc:
>
> BridgeDistribution telegram
>
> Or if you're using our Docker container, you will need to add the lines below to
> your .env file:
> OBFS4_ENABLE_ADDITIONAL_VARIABLES=1
> OBFS4V_BridgeDistribution=telegram
>
> It is ok if your WebTunnel bridge is on the same IP address of another existing
> WebTunnel bridge as long as is in a different subdomain name, for example
> www1.example.com. As the censor is blocking the bridges by domain name and not
> by IP.
>
> Please avoid hosting your bridge with Hetzner, Digital Ocean, OVH and do not use
> Cloudflare DNS, as there are reports of these are being targeted and blocked by
> DPI[5].
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> [0][Russia] Blocking Tor resources (2025 edition) (#40057) · Issues · The Tor Project / Anti-censorship / censorship-analysis · GitLab
> [1][Russia] Investigate obsf4 blocking by protocol in mobile 4G in some ISPs (#40050) · Issues · The Tor Project / Anti-censorship / censorship-analysis · GitLab
> [2][Russia] Blocking of webtunnel (#40064) · Issues · The Tor Project / Anti-censorship / censorship-analysis · GitLab
> [3]Distribute WebTunnel bridges via Telegram bot? (#158) · Issues · The Tor Project / Anti-censorship / Team · GitLab
> [4]Tor Project | WebTunnel Bridge
> [5][Russia] Censor has a new method of blocking · Issue #490 · net4people/bbs · GitHub
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list -- tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to tor-relays-leave@lists.torproject.org
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list -- tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tor-relays-leave@lists.torproject.org

--
The Tor Project
Community Team Lead

1 Like