the annual Tor relay operators meetup will be tomorrow (28th) at 2200 UTC+1.
No rC3 ticket required, I'll post the public link here as soon as it's available.
We just finished the meet-up. Thanks Leibi for organizing it, and thanks
everybody for participating. I've attached the notes that we used for
organizing the topics / discussion.
Next meet-up is planned to be around FOSDEM in early February. Stay tuned!
--Roger
···
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 04:29:10AM +0100, Stefan Leibfarth wrote:
the annual Tor relay operators meetup will be tomorrow (28th) at 2200 UTC+1.
No rC3 ticket required
Hear from relay operators here (especially exit relay ops)
I’d like to hear successful experiences of running exit relays from people here. One of my friends hosts one in their home (not a good idea). I think evolution VPS sounds like a good deal for an exit relay, but I’m not sure.
What are the potential legal consequences of running an exit relay, if someone uses it to post illegal material?
In DE, the Providerprivileg should insulate you somewhat against legal consequences (Disclaimer: IANAL), but depending on your local police, you might come in contact with them. (Hasn’t happened to us so far, though.)
In EU, it’s legal: EUR-Lex - 32000L0031 - EN but you might still have the cops “knocking” at your door at 6am and confiscate all your hardware, until their sort things out.
In .fr, as Nos Oignons, we ~regularly get letters from the cops, and some convocations to the police station.
New Tor forum (https://forum.torproject.org/), useful for individual relay operator support (alternative to private helpdesk), not intending to replace tor-relays@ list
tor-relays@ list
#tor-relays irc channel
relaunch of TorBSDv2 coming
network performance:
relay overload indicators
sbws progress
new congestion control designs should help with geographic diversity
network blocking:
The Russia story
‘Run a bridge’ campaign
(un?)fortunately, most people here are running relays, so can’t run bridge on the same machines
what types are important → obfs4
what internet connection type is best → static IP
Belarus, previous blocking stories
ipv6:
How to run a Relay with a dynamic IPv6 only address?
ipv6-only relays, soon?
no :’(
chicken & egg problem - as long as most relays are ipv4 ??? tor will stay ipv4
The issue is that bridges do self-reachability tests, and won’t publish if their ORPort is unreachable. Also, Serge won’t give it the Running flag, so bridgedb won’t give it out. It’s all just engineering fixes, and we should do them.
Next meetup:
- @ FOSDEM (5 & 6 February '22)
- The exact date and time will be posted @ tor-relay list
KAX17 and what to about it? - discussed, thanks
How to support more diversity in the network, maybe add a flag for relays that are not in common ASes?
I am wondering how bandwidth and consensus weight is measured. I seem to struggle to ramp up high-bandwidth nodes in Asia and even on the US West Coast. Ramping nodes up in Europe is super easy by comparison.
Are there still free shirts/hoodies for relay operators?
Yes! Just ask on tshirt at torproject.org (that’s for the shirts/stickers combo)
Running a bridge and Snowflake proxy on the same host, good or bad idea?
Potential danger: IP address blocked for one will affect the other
I couldn't make the meeting (I retire at the end of January, and should at long last have time to devote to things Tor). Thanks for posting the notes.
It prompted me to review the draft "expectations for relay operators" document. It looks very good, though I do have a quibble. The line "Try not to let the cops get your relay keys"...
...seems to perpetuate the erroneous belief that the main use for Tor is to evade law enforcement
..."cops" can be considered derogatory in some English-speaking cultures and implies that the aims of Tor Project are averse to law enforcement
...ignores a large segment of potential Tor adversaries
I think the community would be better served by language like "Try not to let potential adversaries get your relay keys".
--Ron
PS: I have requested a gitlab account so that I can comment on the document directly, but I have made such a request before and not received a reply.
I couldn't make the meeting (I retire at the end of January, and should at long last have time to devote to things Tor). Thanks for posting the notes.
It prompted me to review the draft "expectations for relay operators" document. It looks very good, though I do have a quibble. The line "Try not to let the cops get your relay keys"...
...seems to perpetuate the erroneous belief that the main use for Tor is to evade law enforcement
..."cops" can be considered derogatory in some English-speaking cultures and implies that the aims of Tor Project are averse to law enforcement
...ignores a large segment of potential Tor adversaries
I think the community would be better served by language like "Try not to let potential adversaries get your relay keys".
Thanks for the feedback, much appreciated.
--Ron
PS: I have requested a gitlab account so that I can comment on the document directly, but I have made such a request before and not received a reply.
You should have now as I approved your account request. If that did not work feel free to ping me off-list and we can sort things out.