[tor-project] nti-censorship meeting notes, 2026-06-18

Hey everyone!

Here are our meeting logs:

And our meeting pad:

Anti-censorship

···

--------------------------------

Next meeting: Thursday, June 25 16:00 UTC
Facilitator: onyinyang

^^^(See Facilitator Queue at tail)

Weekly meetings, every Thursday at 16:00 UTC, in #tor-meeting at OFTC
(channel is logged while meetings are in progress)

This week's Facilitator: meskio
== Goal of this meeting ==

Weekly check-in about the status of anti-censorship work at Tor.
Coordinate collaboration between people/teams on anti-censorship at the Tor Project and Tor community.

== Links to Useful documents ==
  * Our anti-censorship roadmap:
    * Roadmap:Issue Boards · Issues by Assignee · Boards · Anti-censorship · GitLab
  * The anti-censorship team's wiki page:
    * Home · Wiki · The Tor Project / Anti-censorship / Team · GitLab
  * Past meeting notes can be found at:
    * https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/
  * Tickets that need reviews: from projects, we are working on:
    * All needs review tickets:
      * Merge requests · Anti-censorship · GitLab
  * Projects the TPI anti-censorship team is working on:
    * Project 201: Signaling channels
      * milestone for may Project 201: Deliverables to be completed in May · The Tor Project · GitLab
      * board Issue Boards · Development Kanban Board · Boards · The Tor Project · GitLab

== Announcements ==
  *
== Discussion ==

  * TLS imitation route
    * opened an issue to talk about it with the applications team
      * Request for Comment: Rust Library for TLS Fingerprint Imitation with Delegation Route Usage in Tor Browser (#45056) · Issues · The Tor Project / Applications / Tor Browser · GitLab

== Actions ==

  *

== Interesting links ==

== Reading group ==

  * We will discuss "" on
    *
    * Questions to ask and goals to have:
      * What aspects of the paper are questionable?
      * Are there immediate actions we can take based on this work?
      * Are there long-term actions we can take based on this work?
        *
      * Is there future work that we want to call out in hopes that others will pick it up?
  * Next in the Reading Group Queue:
    *

== Updates ==
Name:
    This week:
      - What you worked on this week.
    Next week:
      - What you are planning to work on next week.
    Help with:
      - Something you need help with.

cecylia (cohosh): 2026-06-18
  Last week:
      - lead a learning session on snowflake prometheus metrics at all hands
      - started implementation of rate limiting feature of proxy fairness proposal
      - reviews
  Next week:
      - continue to review PT spec implementation in UAT
      - make proxy-bridge reachability checks robust to bridge outages (snowflake#40504)
      - more work on letting broker inform proxies how often to poll
          - monitor proxy poll rates and adjust as needed
      - follow up about running shadow simulations for snowflake performance
      - revisit conjure integration with lyrebird
      - take a look at potential snowflake orbot bug
          - [BUG] 20% CPU overhead in kindness mode · Issue #1183 · guardianproject/orbot-android · GitHub
  
dcf: 2026-06-18
  Last week:
  Next week:
  Help with:

meskio: 2026-06-18
    Last week:
        - make debian packages of lyrebird, snowflake and webtunnel with goreleaser (tpa/team#42549)
    Next week:
        - telegram distributing bridges with local addresses (rdsys#306)

Shelikhoo: 2026-06-18
    Last Week:
         - [Testing] Unreliable+unordered WebRTC data channel transport for Snowflake rev2 (cont.)( Draft: Unreliable+unordered WebRTC data channel transport for Snowflake rev2 (!315) · Merge requests · The Tor Project / Anti-censorship / Pluggable Transports / Snowflake · GitLab ) testing environment setup/research
      - Merge request Reviews
      - [Research] proxy pool overload and potential blocking in Iran ( Add three NAT type buckets to the snowflake broker (#40077) · Issues · The Tor Project / Anti-censorship / Pluggable Transports / Snowflake · GitLab )
      - [Research] Add three NAT type buckets to the snowflake broker ( Add three NAT type buckets to the snowflake broker (#40077) · Issues · The Tor Project / Anti-censorship / Pluggable Transports / Snowflake · GitLab )
      - Add Socks5 Based Interactive Connectivity Test for snowflake (Add Socks5 Based Interactive Connectivity Test (!699) · Merge requests · The Tor Project / Anti-censorship / Pluggable Transports / Snowflake · GitLab) (Done)
      - [Research] Request for Comment: Rust Library for TLS Fingerprint Imitation with Delegation Route Usage in Tor Browser) Request for Comment: Rust Library for TLS Fingerprint Imitation with Delegation Route Usage in Tor Browser (#45056) · Issues · The Tor Project / Applications / Tor Browser · GitLab
    Next (working) Week/TODO:
        - Merge request reviews
        - [Deployment]Unreliable+unordered WebRTC data channel transport for Snowflake rev2 (cont.)( Draft: Unreliable+unordered WebRTC data channel transport for Snowflake rev2 (!315) · Merge requests · The Tor Project / Anti-censorship / Pluggable Transports / Snowflake · GitLab ) Building custom Tor Browser with patch applied
        - Vantage point maintaince
      - [Research] proxy pool overload and potential blocking in Iran ( Add three NAT type buckets to the snowflake broker (#40077) · Issues · The Tor Project / Anti-censorship / Pluggable Transports / Snowflake · GitLab )
      - [Research] Add three NAT type buckets to the snowflake broker ( Add three NAT type buckets to the snowflake broker (#40077) · Issues · The Tor Project / Anti-censorship / Pluggable Transports / Snowflake · GitLab )
      - Add 3 type nat bucket to snowflake broker
      - [Research] Request for Comment: Rust Library for TLS Fingerprint Imitation with Delegation Route Usage in Tor Browser) Request for Comment: Rust Library for TLS Fingerprint Imitation with Delegation Route Usage in Tor Browser (#45056) · Issues · The Tor Project / Applications / Tor Browser · GitLab
      (cont.)

onyinyang: 2026-06-18
  Last week(s):
      - Work for project #170 to detect bridge blocking
  Next week:
       - Continue tasks for project #170
    
   Switch back to some of these:
       As time allows:
          - Continue work on rdsys#196
        - Continue Investigating rdsys#248 i.e., why dysfunctional webtunnel bridges are being distributed
        - Troubleshooting conjure not connecting in China
            - waiting for more information from conjure authors/maintainers
        - Lox still seems to be filling up the disk on the rdsys-test server despite changes made to delete old entries, look into what's going wrong
               Blog post for conjure: https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/conjure/-/issues/46
              - review Tor browser Lox integration Bug 43096: Move to Rust for the Lox integration (!1300) · Merge requests · The Tor Project / Applications / Tor Browser · GitLab
              - add TTL cache to lox MR for duplicate responses:
    Enable repeat responses to successful Lox requests (!305) · Merge requests · The Tor Project / Anti-censorship / lox · GitLab

      - Work on outstanding milestone issues:
        - key rotation automation
    
    Later:
    pending decision on abandoning lox wasm in favour of some kind of FFI? Consider dropping Lox's WASM (#43096) · Issues · The Tor Project / Applications / Tor Browser · GitLab):
      - add pref to handle timing for pubkey checks in Tor browser
      - add trusted invitation logic to tor browser integration:
      Lox module doesn't include trusted invitation redemption (#42974) · Issues · The Tor Project / Applications / Tor Browser · GitLab
    - improve metrics collection/think about how to show Lox is working/valuable
    - sketch out Lox blog post/usage notes for forum
    
  (long term things were discussed at the meeting!):
    - brainstorming grouping strategies for Lox buckets (of bridges) and gathering context on how types of bridges are distributed/use in practice
      Question: What makes a bridge usable for a given user, and how can we encode that to best ensure we're getting the most appropriate resources to people?
        1. Are there some obvious grouping strategies that we can already consider?
          e.g., by PT, by bandwidth (lower bandwidth bridges sacrificed to open-invitation buckets?), by locale (to be matched with a requesting user's geoip or something?)
        2. Does it make sense to group 3 bridges/bucket, so trusted users have access to 3 bridges (and untrusted users have access to 1)? More? Less?
    
theodorsm: 2026-05-28
    Last weeks:
      - Researching possible DTLS block in Russia
        - Snowflake-targeted DTLS filtering in Russia, starting 2026-03-30 · Issue #603 · net4people/bbs · GitHub
      - Implementing DTLS 1.3 in pion
    Next weeks:
      - Implementing DTLS 1.3 in pion
    Help with:
      -
      
Facilitator Queue:
  onyinyang shelikhoo cohosh meskio
1. First available staff in the Facilitator Queue will be the facilitator for the meeting
2. After facilitating the meeting, the facilitator will be moved to the tail of the queue

--
meskio | https://meskio.net/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
My contact info: https://meskio.net/crypto.txt
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Nos vamos a Croatan.