I seem to remember another. When that discussion was taking place I was still running restricted and none of that seemed important so 2.5 would not have clicked. A little later I was convinced to go unrestricted (late Nov 2024) because they were more needed (I think). But anyway the message is the same.
I am more curious about “To make the traffic less suspicious one should not limit the port range”.
Are you saying they (the censors) track UDP connections to outside IPs trying to find a pattern. I would thing a whole UDP conversation to an outside IP sounds suspicious. So I’ll triple what I now use.