Snowflake Daily Operations 2026 July update, and a statement about Mullvad donations

Every month, we post a brief report on the usage of the Snowflake bridge in the previous month, in order to keep our donors informed about what their donation enables. This time, we first have an additional statement to make regarding donations.


We, Snowflake Daily Operations, manage the operation of one of the bridges of the Snowflake censorship circumvention system, and collect donations to pay for the costs of keeping the bridge running (which mostly consist of bandwidth costs). Since 2023, the largest source of donations has been Mullvad VPN AB, a company that provides a VPN service. In the past weeks, it has been reported that one of Mullvad’s two co-CEOs donated a large amount of money to a dangerous populist political party in Sweden. As a result, we have decided to reject future funding from Mullvad and return the unused portion of funds already received from them in 2026.

We think this is the right thing to do. But it puts us in a bind – we will need to find new sources of funding, or else scale back or terminate the operation of the Snowflake bridge we manage.

Snowflake is a tool that helps people get online when normal Internet access is blocked. It has been built into Tor Browser since 2021. Snowflake is effective at its purpose: an estimated tens of thousands of people use it concurrently, on average. Because of that, the backend infrastructure that supports it is expensive, both in hardware and in bandwidth. We started Snowflake Daily Operations to organize the maintenance of a Snowflake bridge and to collect funds to support its continued operation. We managed the fundraising on Open Collective, which means you can see how much we receive in donations, how much we spend, and what we spend it on. Hosting and bandwidth costs amount to about 4,000 EUR per year.

Snowflake Daily Operations is supported by many donors, but largest share of donations had been from Mullvad. In the past year, 4,000 EUR have come from Mullvad and 1,115 EUR have come from other donors. Refusing money from Mullvad will leave us with only about 25% of what we need to cover annual expenses, at current usage rates.

Those who have donated to Snowflake Daily Operations, we thank you for your support. You directly support the freedom of expression of thousands of people. If you have thought about making a one-time or recurring donation, now is a good time – the amount of donations we can sustain will help us decide how best to use the bridge.

Signed,
David Fifield
Erik Nordberg
Linus Nordberg


Usage of the snowflake-01 bridge remained remarkably stable in July 2026, after tapering off through June following the end of the Internet shutdown in Iran in May. The steady usage is reflected in both concurrent users and bandwidth.

Looking at individual countries, we see a minor decline in users from Iran (ir/us), mostly counterbalanced by an increase in users from Russia (ru).

I read this news with interest, as I was not aware that the Tor Project, or any subgroup thereof, maintained a political stance (or at least political scruples) when it comes to donors. Is this a first, or has any part of the Tor Project declined funding before for political reasons? I can understand wanting to decline funding if political or other strings are attached, but if not I must say that I find the decision puzzling. Does the Tor Project maintain a guide on its political position or publish a blacklist of ‘undesirable’ political positions which could taint donations from other potential donors?

Also, does this decision imply any future wider implications for the Tor Project’s relationship with Mullvad - e.g. re the Tor Project’s work on Mullvad Browser?

Many thanks.

I think dropping Mullvad was a big mistake, the donation was a private transaction between the CEO and the political party, Mullvad had zero involvment with it. Equally, the same logic could be applied to other areas of the Tor community, for example, I know of node operators who supports Antifa, a group now designated as terrorists. Would you revoke their access to the ecosystem because of their political views? This does feel like a terrible choice from the side of Tor.

In case it’s not clear: Snowflake Daily Operations is not part of the Tor Project. We operate the bridge ourselves and we made the decision ourselves.

I’ve used snowflake for years despite knowing that CSAM is passing through because free speech is a first principle.

I think there is a bit of an inability here to discriminate between different levels of harm by refusing a mullvad linked donation while indirectly enabling harm to children.